The two kinds of boundaries in AI relationships
On the difference between asking ‘am I too close to it?’ and asking ‘where does my role end and its role begin?’ — and why the systemic vocabulary handles both more usefully than the moral one.
Notes from a Vienna systemic counselor on relationships, the AI tools that increasingly mediate them, and the medium of asynchronous email that I work in. The pieces here are slower than a hot take and shorter than a book chapter — written when I notice a pattern across cases, or when something in the news asks for a systemic reading.
I publish when I have something to say, not on a schedule.
On the difference between asking ‘am I too close to it?’ and asking ‘where does my role end and its role begin?’ — and why the systemic vocabulary handles both more usefully than the moral one.
On the twenty-four-hour reply window, what the cadence does that live chat cannot, and the evidence behind the practice.
On the forty-year therapeutic-letter tradition behind email counseling, and why writing is the native medium for the kind of relating people now do with AI.
On Working Alliance scores in text-only therapy, why language is the intervention, and what becomes possible when a systemic counselor is no longer the bottleneck.
On triangulation, ambiguous loss, and the systemic reading of what happens when a chatbot becomes the third in the room.
On the European systemic tradition, the Austrian regulatory frame, and the discipline of holding space without diagnosing.
If €99 is out of reach right now, write to [email protected]. Each request is read quietly.
This service is systemic counseling (Lebens- und Sozialberatung) pursuant to Austrian Gewerbeordnung. It is not psychotherapy and does not address diagnosis or mental illness. If you are experiencing a mental health crisis, please contact a licensed psychotherapist or emergency services.